Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider/Clarify RAG data as training data #11

Open
IchordeDionysos opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Consider/Clarify RAG data as training data #11

IchordeDionysos opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@IchordeDionysos
Copy link

IchordeDionysos commented Mar 24, 2025

In the specification, the term training data is mentioned a couple of times.

However, especially for LLMs the vast majority of use-cases does not train LLMs on their own and rather enriches/improves the LLMs performance via various means, such as RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation).

With RAG, one would fetch additional data from various sources to enrich the prompt with additional context, improving response accuracy.

Given you might feed copyrighted material to a model and that model might output that data unaltered, RAG data should be held to the same standard as traditional training data.


I propose to specify that with training data, it also means RAG data.

e.g. for 2.12:

Before:
Check regulatory obligations to ensure compliance when handling and processing model training data.

After:
Check regulatory obligations to ensure compliance when handling and processing model training or RAG data.

Same for the other requirements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant