Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that libcuda.so is in the ldcache #947

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

elezar
Copy link
Member

@elezar elezar commented Feb 27, 2025

These changes add a hook to create soname symlinks (e.g. libcuda.so.1 -> libcuda.so.RM_VERSION) to ensure that the libcuda.so -> libcuda.so.1 -> libcuda.so.RM_VERSION symlink chain exists when the ldcache is updated. This allows libcuda.so to be present in the ldcache when ldconfig is run.

Note that since we're adding a new hook, a generating client such as the k8s-device plugin or the k8s-dra-driver-gpu must be used with a nvidia-cdi-hook binary with a sufficient version.

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Collaborator

/ok to test

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This PR adds an end-to-end test to verify that the libcuda symlink chain is properly present in the ldcache when running via Docker with NVIDIA runtime. Key changes include:

  • Addition of the "strings" import to support string splitting.
  • New test block that pulls an Ubuntu image and runs a container to inspect the ldcache output for libcuda.
  • Parsing and validation of the ldcache output to ensure both "libcuda.so" and "libcuda.so.1" are present.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
tests/e2e/nvidia-container-toolkit_test.go Added an end-to-end test to validate the presence of libcuda symlink entries in the ldcache

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch from 6e7e1a8 to 44e6630 Compare February 27, 2025 13:25

// Create the 'create-soname-symlinks' command
c := cli.Command{
Name: "create-soname-symlinks",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@klueska I elected to add a new hook entirely instead of modifying the existing update-ldcache. This is in keeping with "purpose-built hooks" and also means that the hook name can be used to indicate the intent.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ArangoGutierrez ArangoGutierrez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, just one nit

@elezar elezar linked an issue Feb 27, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch from 44e6630 to e43da10 Compare February 27, 2025 13:48
@elezar elezar added the must-backport The changes in PR need to be backported to at least one stable release branch. label Feb 27, 2025
@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch 3 times, most recently from daadba9 to 9daa179 Compare February 28, 2025 12:45
@elezar elezar requested review from klueska and jgehrcke February 28, 2025 12:52
Copy link
Contributor

@cdesiniotis cdesiniotis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left one clarifying question, but not a blocker.

"-N",
)
// Explicitly specific the directories to add.
args = append(args, dirs...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question -- does this create .so symlinks for all libraries present in the specified directories? Does this differ from the behavior of the legacy libnvidia-container implementation, which IIRC would only create the .so symlinks for a small list of libraries (like libcuda.so)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not the .so symlinks, but the SONAME symlinks i.e. libcuda.so.1 -> libcuda.so.RM_VERSION in the case of libcuda. The .so symlinks are created using the "standard" create-symlinks hook.

@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch from 9daa179 to 035abe0 Compare March 6, 2025 08:30
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Mar 6, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@elezar elezar removed the must-backport The changes in PR need to be backported to at least one stable release branch. label Mar 6, 2025
@elezar
Copy link
Member Author

elezar commented Mar 6, 2025

@cdesiniotis I am removing the must-backport label for this. Although this was triggered by a customer request, there is a workaround available and I would rather not backport another new hook to the release-1.17 branch.

@jgehrcke
Copy link

jgehrcke commented Mar 6, 2025

and I would rather not backport another new hook to the release-1.17 branch.

Sounds good.

if hostDriverVersion == "" {
m.logger.Debugf("Host driver version not specified")
return "", nil
}
if !containerRoot.hasPath(cudaCompatPath) {
if !containerRoot.HasPath(cudaCompatPath) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have picked a more or less arbitrary place in the code to put the following comment. Having more expressive variable names would make review for me easier. You can postpone looking at this comment until after merge, that's fine with me! In the spirit of learning what we do here however I'd appreciate an answer at some point :)

In my software engineering life I have always deeply cared about file system terminology and operations, and about making related code readable and self-expressive. For example,

  • I like to distinguish a "relative path" from an "absolute path" via variable name (if possible)
  • I like to distinguish a file object from a file path via variable name
  • I like to distinguish a path to a file from a path to a directory (expressing intent, of course these are technically the same)
  • I like to call things a "base name" for expressing intent a well (when there are no path separators, and this is supposed to be a "file name" or "directory name").

What is containerRoot in canonical unix file path terminology?

  • Is it guaranteed to point to a directory?
  • Is it an absolute path?
  • Is it always just /?

What are some properties about cudaCompatPath that we know/guarantee, that we could also express in the variable name or in the type?

  • Is it always a relative path (not starting with `/)?
  • Is it always a path to a directory?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for calling this out. I think we could do a pass through this and improve readability greatly. There is no rush on this particular PR (I've elected to hold the changes back from the v1.17.5 release) and as such, I think we can address these concerns here instead of as a follow-up.

The containerRootDir is the absolute path on the host filesystem to the root (/) of the container filesystem. It is specified in the OCI Runtime Specification as Root which informs the slightly ambiguous name. The containerRoot variable is the typed representation of this directory that allows us to attached helper functions such as HasPath / Resolve / Glob to it.

The cudaCompatPath is the absolute path to the directory containing the CUDA compat libraries in the container (if it exists). It defined as a constant with value /usr/local/cuda/compat. That is to say, it is always an absolute path to a directory in the container, and we're confirming that this exists, but have to calculate the path to this folder on the host filesystem to do this check.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can address these concerns here instead of as a follow-up.

Thank you for that!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The containerRootDir is the absolute path on the host filesystem to the root (/) of the container filesystem

Is the container filesystem always accessible from within the host filesystem?

It is specified in the OCI Runtime Specification as Root which informs the slightly ambiguous name.

gotcha. Thanks for that background.

The cudaCompatPath is the absolute path to the directory containing the CUDA compat libraries in the container (if it exists).

Thank you for that precision. Now, that is quickly&easily understandable.

but have to calculate the path to this folder on the host filesystem to do this check

meaning that it's always mounted into the container, and never baked into it?

)

// A ContainerRoot represents the root filesystem of a container.
type ContainerRoot string
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, it's just a string.

Relates to my previous comment: I'd love to see the intent expressed in the variable name: path to a directory?

And this is probably really just my lack of knowledge: I wonder: when is the container's root file system not located at just /?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have added som context above. Let me know if it's not clear and I can add more information.

Copy link

@jgehrcke jgehrcke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for all the work! I understand very little but you have my full emotional support! And I know you will repair everything you destroy. In that sense: approved with honor. 🚀

@elezar elezar added this to the v1.18.0 milestone Mar 19, 2025
@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch from 035abe0 to 305c2e2 Compare March 19, 2025 14:55
elezar added 3 commits March 20, 2025 13:21
Thsi change moves the ContainerRoot type to the oci package and updates
state.GetContainerRootDirPath to return a variable of type ContainerRoot. This
enabled better reuse between hooks.

Signed-off-by: Evan Lezar <[email protected]>
This change updates the enable-cuda-compat implementation to also use
oci.ContainerRoot.

Signed-off-by: Evan Lezar <[email protected]>
Since the creation of a .conf file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d is shared by
both the update-ldcache and enable-cuda-compat hooks, this is moved
to the ContainerRoot type.

Signed-off-by: Evan Lezar <[email protected]>
@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch from 305c2e2 to 7229201 Compare March 20, 2025 11:24
This change adds a create-soname-symlinks hook that can be used to ensure
that the soname symlinks for injected libraries exist in a container.

This is done by calling ldconfig -n -N for the folders containing the injected
libraries.

This also ensures that libcuda.so is present in the ldcache when the update-ldcache
hook is run.

Signed-off-by: Evan Lezar <[email protected]>
@elezar elezar force-pushed the ensure-libcuda.so-in-ldcache branch from 7229201 to bdfaea4 Compare March 20, 2025 12:56
@@ -113,15 +113,15 @@ func (m command) run(c *cli.Context, cfg *config) error {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to load container state: %v", err)
}

containerRoot, err := s.GetContainerRoot()
containerRoot, err := s.GetContainerRootDirPath()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️ Thanks for adding clarity here.

And now that I have read your explanation.. this is a path that is valid in the host filesystem, and points to the container filesystem's root..? :)

@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ func (m command) run(c *cli.Context, cfg *config) error {
}

// getPaths updates the specified paths relative to the root.
// TODO(elezar): This function should be updated to make use of the oci.ContainerRoot type.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:)

return fmt.Errorf("failed to load container state: %v", err)
}

containerRoot, err := s.GetContainerRootDirPath()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Below I see we sometimes have a nice OnHost suffix. Could this be applicable here, too?

return fmt.Errorf("failed to determined container root: %v", err)
}
if containerRoot == "" {
m.logger.Warningf("No container root detected")
Copy link

@jgehrcke jgehrcke Mar 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when can/does this happen in practice?
(for my own curiosity/understanding)

if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to determined container root: %w", err)
}

containerForwardCompatDir, err := m.getContainerForwardCompatDir(containerRoot(containerRootDir), cfg.hostDriverVersion)
containerForwardCompatDir, err := m.getContainerForwardCompatDirPathInContainer(containerRootDirPath, cfg.hostDriverVersion)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for having added the InContainer suffix here. I know these things get lengthy but the information density is really good and this makes stuff no-brainer readable, which was the goal.

And again, the containerRootDirPath can be thought of as a containerRootDirPathOnHost, right?

Copy link

@jgehrcke jgehrcke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for all the iteration. Let's land this. I have left a few more questions while browsing this, but please don't slow down landing this because of my remarks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LDCache does not include libcuda.so
4 participants