Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

check_xxx_rr functions should only ever use semantic errors #227

Open
k0ekk0ek opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

check_xxx_rr functions should only ever use semantic errors #227

k0ekk0ek opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@k0ekk0ek
Copy link
Contributor

A lot of check functions, the function called after parsing an RR in generic notation, use syntax errors. This is incorrect. The generic notation is frequently used to write RRs that do not meet requirements. Use semantic errors instead so that secondary servers that use generic notation to write RRs that are off can read them back in. The syntax itself is correct as it passed the generic parse function.

@k0ekk0ek k0ekk0ek added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant