Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Verdict needs to be an enum we can match on #103

Closed
tertsdiepraam opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #118
Closed

Verdict needs to be an enum we can match on #103

tertsdiepraam opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #118

Comments

@tertsdiepraam
Copy link
Contributor

Verdict is currently a pretty opaque type that cannot be matched on making it effectively useless in Roto (apart from exiting the script). This makes testing harder.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Optional values and big typecheck refactor NLnetLabs/roto
1 participant
@tertsdiepraam