Skip to content

API Response Compression Middleware #325

@phertyameen

Description

@phertyameen

Labels: middleware, performance, optimization, medium-priority

Description:

Create response compression middleware to reduce bandwidth usage and improve API response times through gzip/brotli compression.

Requirements:

Compress response bodies over a certain size threshold (1KB)
Support multiple compression algorithms:

  1. Brotli (best compression, modern browsers)
  2. Gzip (good compression, universal support)
  3. Deflate (fallback)

Negotiate compression based on Accept-Encoding header
Skip compression for:

  • Already compressed content (images, videos)
  • Small responses (under 1KB)
  • Streaming responses

Set appropriate Content-Encoding headers
Configure compression levels (trade-off between speed and size)
Cache compressed responses when appropriate
Monitor compression ratios for optimization

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Large JSON responses compressed by 60-80%
  • Compression algorithm selected based on client support
  • Small responses not compressed (overhead not worth it)
  • Compressed responses correctly decompressed by clients
  • Content-Encoding header properly set
  • Compression level configurable (balance CPU vs bandwidth)
  • No corruption of binary data
  • Performance improved for slow connections
  • Bandwidth usage reduced by 50%+ on average
  • No compression of already-compressed formats (images)

Compression Strategy:

  • Brotli (quality 4) for modern browsers
  • Gzip (level 6) for older browsers
  • No compression for IE 6 and older

Content Types to Compress:

  • application/json
  • text/html
  • text/plain
  • application/javascript
  • text/css
  • text/xml

Content Types to Skip:

  • image/* (JPEG, PNG already compressed)
  • video/* (already compressed)
  • audio/* (already compressed)
  • application/zip
  • application/gzip

Thresholds:

  • Minimum size for compression: 1024 bytes
  • Maximum CPU time for compression: 50ms
  • Target compression ratio: 70% size reduction

Performance Considerations:

  • CPU usage vs bandwidth savings
  • Compression level tuning (6 for gzip, 4 for brotli)
  • Caching compressed responses
  • Async compression for large payloads

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Stellar WaveIssues in the Stellar wave program

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions