Commit 128eb41
committed
[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/mi_task_arg.exp on arm-linux
On arm-linux, I run into:
...
PASS: gdb.ada/mi_task_arg.exp: mi runto task_switch.break_me
Expecting: ^(-stack-list-arguments 1[^M
]+)?(\^done,stack-args=\[frame={level="0",args=\[\]},frame={level="1",args=\[{name="<_task>",value="0x[0-9A-Fa-f]+"}(,{name="<_taskL>",value="[0-9]+"})?\]},frame={level="2",args=\[({name="self_id",value="(0x[0-9A-Fa-f]+|<optimized out>)"})?\]},.*[^M
]+[(]gdb[)] ^M
[ ]*)
-stack-list-arguments 1^M
^done,stack-args=[frame={level="0",args=[]},frame={level="1",args=[{name="<_task>",value="0x40bc48"}]},frame={level="2",args=[]}]^M
(gdb) ^M
FAIL: gdb.ada/mi_task_arg.exp: -stack-list-arguments 1 (unexpected output)
...
The problem is that the test-case expects a level 3 frame, but there is none.
This can be reproduced using cli bt:
...
$ gdb -q -batch outputs/gdb.ada/mi_task_arg/task_switch \
-ex "b task_switch.break_me" \
-ex run \
-ex bt
Breakpoint 1 at 0x34b4: file task_switch.adb, line 57.
Thread 3 "my_caller" hit Breakpoint 1, task_switch.break_me () \
at task_switch.adb:57
57 null;
#0 task_switch.break_me () at task_switch.adb:57
#1 0x00403424 in task_switch.caller (<_task>=0x40bc48) at task_switch.adb:51
#2 0xf7f95a08 in ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libgnarl-12.so
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
...
The purpose of the test-case is printing the frame at level 1, so I don't
think we should bother about the presence of the frame at level 3.
Fix this by allowing the backtrace to stop at level 2.
Tested on arm-linux.
Approved-By: Luis Machado <[email protected]>
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <[email protected]>1 parent 91b9998 commit 128eb41
1 file changed
+4
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
49 | 49 | | |
50 | 50 | | |
51 | 51 | | |
52 | | - | |
53 | | - | |
54 | | - | |
55 | 52 | | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
| 55 | + | |
| 56 | + | |
0 commit comments