You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[reporter="johnk", created="Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:15:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00)"]
Farrago & Fennel aren't SQL2003 compliant in that they allow inequality testing of BLOB/VARBINARY/BINARY types, rather than strict equality testing.
A future compatability mode should address this extension. Also, perhaps this extension should be documented.
[author="jvs", created="Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:06:58 -0500 (GMT-05:00)"]
We suspect that if the standard ever admits BINARY and VARBINARY, these rules will change. It was agreed that rather than flagging inequality usages as compliance warnings, we should instead flag usage of BINARY and VARBINARY themselves.
[reporter="johnk", created="Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:15:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00)"]
Farrago & Fennel aren't SQL2003 compliant in that they allow inequality testing of BLOB/VARBINARY/BINARY types, rather than strict equality testing.
A future compatability mode should address this extension. Also, perhaps this extension should be documented.
See bug
FNL-1and also:SQL2003 Part 2 Section 4.3.2 and
SQL2003 Part 2 Section 8.2 General Rule 4
SQL99 Part 2 Section 4.2.1
SQL99 Part 2 Section 8.2, General Rule 3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: