Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accuracy issues #7

Open
HJ-Xu opened this issue Mar 7, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Accuracy issues #7

HJ-Xu opened this issue Mar 7, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@HJ-Xu
Copy link

HJ-Xu commented Mar 7, 2021

Hi, thanks for your great work. But when I train the Faust of remesh like the code you provided, I can't get the same accuracy as the GT you provided. The accuracy is about 20% lower, and the match I get exceeds the limit. How can I solve this problem?

@bach-zouk
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello,

Thank you for reporting this. 20 % drop you refer to, does it correspond to the map obtained by surfmnet or by surfmnet +pmf(refinement)?

Also, what do you mean by match exceeding the limit?

@HJ-Xu
Copy link
Author

HJ-Xu commented Mar 10, 2021

Hello,

I am very happy to receive your reply. I followed the code you provided to download and ran the code here. The network parameters in the test provided in your code are trained on Faust_original data, and good results can be obtained.

But I used the code you provided to train the network with the Faust_remesh data set 00-79, and then use the Faust_remesh data set 80-99 to test the network, but I still can't get the result of Supervised Methods on FAUST Remesh as shown in Figure 3 in your paper.

I used the method mentioned in your letter to get the result, and during the processing, the index will be out of bounds. For example, the remesh data A has 4999 vertices, and the matches obtained by using your test_DFMnet.py file may exist. The index value is 5000.
What should I do now? Or can I get the model parameter file that you trained on the Faust_remesh data set 00-79?

Thank you again for your reply, and sincerely ask for your answers.

@bach-zouk
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

this should not be the case. At the moment, I am a bit busy with iccv deadline. Can you perhaps try this repo in pytorch ,also written by a student in our lab? https://github.com/pvnieo/SURFMNet-pytorch
I will come back to your issues about this repo in a week. Sorry

@HJ-Xu
Copy link
Author

HJ-Xu commented Mar 12, 2021

hello,

I ran the code according to your recommended version of pytorch, but I still encounter the same problem.

Looking forward to your answers again when you are finished.

@bach-zouk
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

You mean accuracy issue or index out of bound issue?

@HJ-Xu
Copy link
Author

HJ-Xu commented Mar 12, 2021

Hi,

Thanks for your reply, I do have these problems at the moment.

But it is worth noting that these problems only occur when using code to train Faust_remesh. When I train Faust_origin and download FAUST_remeshed_matches on the https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qvqtJz-_zvMxC0ZMuFGbtlKxc9Py3Ggg you provided, the accuracy obtained after processing is the result shown in your paper, which makes me very confused.

Perhaps if the model.ckpt file of your Faust_remesh training at that time is still there, can you send a copy to the email address [email protected]? I want to use your trained model file to test again, thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants