Problem
In claude_service.py, the following errors are not handled with sufficient granularity:
- Anthropic API errors: Only generic exceptions are caught; specific Anthropic errors (such as network issues, invalid API key, malformed request, quota exceeded) are not distinguished or retried.
- Supabase errors: Any database failure (connection, query, insert) is caught generically; there is no custom handling for rate limits, schema mismatches, or partial failures.
- JSON serialization errors: If preference or tool results contain unserializable objects, this could raise exceptions not specifically handled.
- File I/O errors: Reading the system prompt file is not wrapped in its own try/except block; if the file is missing or unreadable, it will cause a generic exception.
- Type errors: If tool input is missing required fields or has wrong types, only some cases are checked; others may cause runtime errors.
- Adapter errors: If FastFlightsAdapter fails (e.g., external API down, invalid parameters), only generic exceptions are caught.
Summary
Exceptions are caught as generic errors and logged, without specific handling, retry mechanisms, or user-friendly messaging for different error types. The function returns an error string for any failure, making debugging and user experience difficult.
Expected improvement:
- Implement granular error handling for each failure type (network, authentication, serialization, database, file, etc.).
- Add retries, specific logging, and user-focused error messages.
- Consider custom exception classes or error codes for clarity.
- Improve resilience and maintainability of claude_service.py.
Problem
In claude_service.py, the following errors are not handled with sufficient granularity:
Summary
Exceptions are caught as generic errors and logged, without specific handling, retry mechanisms, or user-friendly messaging for different error types. The function returns an error string for any failure, making debugging and user experience difficult.
Expected improvement: