You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the main limitations preventing Klipper from being used for broader applications is its lack of support for multiple axes beyond the standard three.
I've been working with naikymen's fork for CNC and pipetting applications and contributed to identifying and resolving issues that expanded Klipper's capabilities to support 9 axes. I can confidently say that Klipper handles this load exceptionally well, with all axes moving synchronously across multiple MCUs.
Given this success, I’m curious if there is any interest from the Kalico team in officially expanding motion support beyond 3 axes.
Looking forward to your thoughts!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
One of the main limitations preventing Klipper from being used for broader applications is its lack of support for multiple axes beyond the standard three.
I've been working with naikymen's fork for CNC and pipetting applications and contributed to identifying and resolving issues that expanded Klipper's capabilities to support 9 axes. I can confidently say that Klipper handles this load exceptionally well, with all axes moving synchronously across multiple MCUs.
Given this success, I’m curious if there is any interest from the Kalico team in officially expanding motion support beyond 3 axes.
Looking forward to your thoughts!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: