Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (32 loc) · 1.2 KB

File metadata and controls

46 lines (32 loc) · 1.2 KB

Feature Track Compared To Spec-Driven Workflows

Feature Track is not a full spec-driven development framework. It is a repo-native feature-memory layer for AI coding agents.

Different Center Of Gravity

Spec-driven workflows usually center on a change:

  • proposal
  • design
  • spec delta
  • tasks
  • implementation
  • archive

Feature Track centers on a long-lived feature:

  • current status
  • source-of-truth links
  • current behavior
  • decisions
  • risks
  • changelog

When Feature Track Fits Best

Feature Track is a good fit when:

  • the project already has scattered docs
  • the team wants AI agents to recover context quickly
  • the project is brownfield and migration should be incremental
  • solo developers or small teams want low process overhead
  • old plans should not be mistaken for current truth

When A Full Spec Workflow May Fit Better

A full spec-driven workflow may be better when:

  • every change needs formal review artifacts
  • multiple teams coordinate through spec approvals
  • a system behavior spec must be updated before implementation
  • auditability matters more than adoption speed

Short Version

Spec frameworks help agents plan the next change. Feature Track helps agents remember the feature.