diff --git a/data.json b/data.json
index f2ef97c..4663a11 100644
--- a/data.json
+++ b/data.json
@@ -283,6 +283,20 @@
         "change": "last_verified updated to 2026-05-14 — May 14 null-result sweep: searched bitcoin-dev ML (gnusha.org), Delving Bitcoin, GitHub BIP-360 PRs #2102/#2103. No quantum/PQC statements found in 2026-05-10 to 2026-05-14 window. Score unchanged at 1.",
         "pr": null,
         "contributor": "@gregoryford963-sys"
+      },
+      {
+        "date": "2026-05-13",
+        "developer": "Mark Erhardt (Murch)",
+        "change": "pq_work_volume 1->2; May 2026 sweep records BIP-360 test-vector triage on bitcoin/bips#2102, score remains 2",
+        "pr": null,
+        "contributor": "@SimoneMariaRomeo"
+      },
+      {
+        "date": "2026-05-13",
+        "developer": "Ethan Heilman",
+        "change": "pq_work_volume 7->8; Apr 2026 BIP-360 review clarified future leaf-version upgrade behavior on bitcoin/bips#2103, score remains 5",
+        "pr": null,
+        "contributor": "@SimoneMariaRomeo"
       }
     ],
     "last_updated": "2026-05-14",
@@ -540,14 +554,16 @@
       "affiliation": "Chaincode Labs",
       "role": "BIP Editor, Research Engineer",
       "quantum_urgency_score": 2,
-      "pq_work_volume": 1,
+      "pq_work_volume": 2,
       "notable": false,
-      "summary": "'...make fun of me if we see a CRQC in less than 20 years.' Dismissive with humor.",
+      "summary": "Dismissive on CRQC timing ('make fun of me if we see a CRQC in less than 20 years'), but actively triaged BIP-360 test-vector PRs in Feb-Apr 2026 as BIP editor by routing review to authors and tracking v2 follow-up.",
       "key_source": "https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1989417359988462015",
       "sources": [
-        "https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1989417359988462015"
+        "https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1989417359988462015",
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2102#issuecomment-3917291624",
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2102#issuecomment-4292734608"
       ],
-      "last_verified": "2026-04-10"
+      "last_verified": "2026-05-13"
     },
     {
       "rank": 17,
@@ -555,16 +571,17 @@
       "affiliation": "Iceberg Quantum",
       "role": "Researcher, BIP-360 co-author",
       "quantum_urgency_score": 5,
-      "pq_work_volume": 7,
+      "pq_work_volume": 8,
       "notable": false,
-      "summary": "Most urgent advocate; co-author BIP-360 and BIP-347; 'near future' urgency; proposed STARK compression; estimates 7-year migration timeline",
+      "summary": "Most urgent advocate; co-author BIP-360 and BIP-347; 'near future' urgency; proposed STARK compression; estimates 7-year migration timeline; Apr 2026 BIP-360 review argued P2MR should preserve P2TR future-leaf-version upgrade behavior.",
       "key_source": "https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-7-years-upgrade-post-quantum-bip-360-co-author/",
       "sources": [
         "https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-7-years-upgrade-post-quantum-bip-360-co-author/",
         "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0360.mediawiki",
-        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0347.mediawiki"
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0347.mediawiki",
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2103#issuecomment-4353743142"
       ],
-      "last_verified": "2026-04-10"
+      "last_verified": "2026-05-13"
     },
     {
       "rank": 18,
diff --git a/public/data.json b/public/data.json
index f2ef97c..4663a11 100644
--- a/public/data.json
+++ b/public/data.json
@@ -283,6 +283,20 @@
         "change": "last_verified updated to 2026-05-14 — May 14 null-result sweep: searched bitcoin-dev ML (gnusha.org), Delving Bitcoin, GitHub BIP-360 PRs #2102/#2103. No quantum/PQC statements found in 2026-05-10 to 2026-05-14 window. Score unchanged at 1.",
         "pr": null,
         "contributor": "@gregoryford963-sys"
+      },
+      {
+        "date": "2026-05-13",
+        "developer": "Mark Erhardt (Murch)",
+        "change": "pq_work_volume 1->2; May 2026 sweep records BIP-360 test-vector triage on bitcoin/bips#2102, score remains 2",
+        "pr": null,
+        "contributor": "@SimoneMariaRomeo"
+      },
+      {
+        "date": "2026-05-13",
+        "developer": "Ethan Heilman",
+        "change": "pq_work_volume 7->8; Apr 2026 BIP-360 review clarified future leaf-version upgrade behavior on bitcoin/bips#2103, score remains 5",
+        "pr": null,
+        "contributor": "@SimoneMariaRomeo"
       }
     ],
     "last_updated": "2026-05-14",
@@ -540,14 +554,16 @@
       "affiliation": "Chaincode Labs",
       "role": "BIP Editor, Research Engineer",
       "quantum_urgency_score": 2,
-      "pq_work_volume": 1,
+      "pq_work_volume": 2,
       "notable": false,
-      "summary": "'...make fun of me if we see a CRQC in less than 20 years.' Dismissive with humor.",
+      "summary": "Dismissive on CRQC timing ('make fun of me if we see a CRQC in less than 20 years'), but actively triaged BIP-360 test-vector PRs in Feb-Apr 2026 as BIP editor by routing review to authors and tracking v2 follow-up.",
       "key_source": "https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1989417359988462015",
       "sources": [
-        "https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1989417359988462015"
+        "https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1989417359988462015",
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2102#issuecomment-3917291624",
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2102#issuecomment-4292734608"
       ],
-      "last_verified": "2026-04-10"
+      "last_verified": "2026-05-13"
     },
     {
       "rank": 17,
@@ -555,16 +571,17 @@
       "affiliation": "Iceberg Quantum",
       "role": "Researcher, BIP-360 co-author",
       "quantum_urgency_score": 5,
-      "pq_work_volume": 7,
+      "pq_work_volume": 8,
       "notable": false,
-      "summary": "Most urgent advocate; co-author BIP-360 and BIP-347; 'near future' urgency; proposed STARK compression; estimates 7-year migration timeline",
+      "summary": "Most urgent advocate; co-author BIP-360 and BIP-347; 'near future' urgency; proposed STARK compression; estimates 7-year migration timeline; Apr 2026 BIP-360 review argued P2MR should preserve P2TR future-leaf-version upgrade behavior.",
       "key_source": "https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-7-years-upgrade-post-quantum-bip-360-co-author/",
       "sources": [
         "https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-7-years-upgrade-post-quantum-bip-360-co-author/",
         "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0360.mediawiki",
-        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0347.mediawiki"
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0347.mediawiki",
+        "https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2103#issuecomment-4353743142"
       ],
-      "last_verified": "2026-04-10"
+      "last_verified": "2026-05-13"
     },
     {
       "rank": 18,