Contact Details
essien.ge@philips.com
Section Number
XX.1.1.X VHL Sharer
1:XX.1.2.2 Retrieve Trust List with DID [ITI-YY2]
1:XX.2.1 Sign Manifest Request Option (VHL Receiver)
1:XX.2 Actor Options
What is wrong
- XX.1.1.X VHL Sharer "The VHL Sharer generates a VHL, provides the VHL to a VHL Holder, and responds to requests from a VHL Sharer to utilize the VHL." - VHL Sharer responds to request from a VHL Sharer? Is this a mistake.
2.1:XX.1.2.2 Retrieve Trust List with DID [ITI-YY2] "They do not have pre-established mechanisms to retrieve PKI material from the Trust Anchor" pre-established mechanism was refered to as a main feature of VHL against SHL, so it seems it is core to YY2, however here it says YY2 is used when not having pre-established mechanism. Maybe good to use another word.
3.1:XX.2.1 Sign Manifest Request Option (VHL Receiver) says "This option provides: Mutual authentication between VHL Receiver and VHL Sharer" here just VHL receiver so maybe itself not mutual but enable sharer to authenticate receiver.
- 1:XX.2 Actor Options - have you missed Sign Manifest Request Option for sharer?
Describe the solution you'd like
No response
Relevant log output
Priority
{"Low" => "Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion."}
Code of Conduct
Contact Details
essien.ge@philips.com
Section Number
XX.1.1.X VHL Sharer
1:XX.1.2.2 Retrieve Trust List with DID [ITI-YY2]
1:XX.2.1 Sign Manifest Request Option (VHL Receiver)
1:XX.2 Actor Options
What is wrong
2.1:XX.1.2.2 Retrieve Trust List with DID [ITI-YY2] "They do not have pre-established mechanisms to retrieve PKI material from the Trust Anchor" pre-established mechanism was refered to as a main feature of VHL against SHL, so it seems it is core to YY2, however here it says YY2 is used when not having pre-established mechanism. Maybe good to use another word.
3.1:XX.2.1 Sign Manifest Request Option (VHL Receiver) says "This option provides: Mutual authentication between VHL Receiver and VHL Sharer" here just VHL receiver so maybe itself not mutual but enable sharer to authenticate receiver.
Describe the solution you'd like
No response
Relevant log output
Priority
{"Low" => "Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion."}
Code of Conduct