update zenodo link and title index

Author: HeinDuijf

index.html

@@ -14579,7 +14579,7 @@
 </div>
 <div class="jp-InputArea jp-Cell-inputArea"><div class="jp-InputPrompt jp-InputArea-prompt">
 </div><div class="jp-RenderedHTMLCommon jp-RenderedMarkdown jp-MarkdownOutput " data-mime-type="text/markdown">
-<h1 id="Majority-voting">Majority voting<a class="anchor-link" href="#Majority-voting">&#182;</a></h1><p>This jupyter notebook demonstrates how the <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7767125">agent-based model</a> of majority voting works by walking you through the stages of the model. The agent-based model is an adaptation of the Condorcetian framework (see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet%27s_jury_theorem">Wikipedia</a> or <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/jury-theorems/">The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a>) which operationalizes the following (revised) assumptions:</p>
+<h1 id="Majority-voting">Majority Voting and Collective Accuracy<a class="anchor-link" href="#Majority-voting">&#182;</a></h1><p>This jupyter notebook demonstrates how the <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7767124">agent-based model</a> of majority voting works by walking you through the stages of the model. The agent-based model is an adaptation of the Condorcetian framework (see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet%27s_jury_theorem">Wikipedia</a> or <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/jury-theorems/">The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a>) which operationalizes the following (revised) assumptions:</p>
 <ol>
 <li><strong>The Assumption of Plural Interests.</strong> For each agent, there exists some agent-relative measure of success or correctness – typically referred to as the agent’s interest or values. </li>
 <li><strong>The Group-relative Competence Assumption.</strong> For each of the two groups (masses and elites), each member’s belief about the right alternative is true with probability greater than chance level.</li>