Defining which services should be digitized first varies from country to country. Prioritization criteria are usually based on selecting high-impact use cases for citizens and businesses and the feasibility of digitalizing them using current and future reusable software components/building blocks - the Country´s technology stack.
The experience gained from deploying and integrating different software components/building blocks and designing the underlying systems needed to enable the priority use cases allows digital teams to gain the necessary experience to work with a building block approach. As more services are developed with reusable software components/BBs, the faster each design and delivery cycle becomes reaching scalability in a more sustainable and cost-efficient manner.
Service Prioritisation Roadmap
More information on how to deploy and integrate building blocks to enable digital government services is available in the GovStack Sandbox documentation.
{% tabs %} {% tab title="Activites / resources" %}
- Rank the catalog of services based on your country´s criteria for impact and feasibility.
- Set one or two exemplar services from quadrant A to work with implementing the GovStack approach to digital service co-design and delivery
- The below criteria are a reference. Each digital team can calibrate current criterion according to information availability, context & needs:
Criteria | Indicator | RFI input |
---|---|---|
Strategic importance | Users demand |
|
Impact | Complexity to access the service |
|
Government Impact |
| |
Business impact |
| |
Technical impact |
| |
Technical feasibility | Technical capacity |
|
Financial resources |
| |
Reliance on other technologies |
| |
Political feasibility | Political acceptability |
|
Regional harmonization |
| |
Stakeholder consensus |
|
- Continuously recalibrate the ranking based on:
- Learnings of the different design and delivery cycles and as re-usability of BBs become common practice across digital teams.
- Simplification measures applied to the service catalog. For example, eliminating services associated with getting documents that another government entity requires by automatic consultations to different registries in government entities using IM BB.
- Re-designing user journeys based on live events and proactively delivering them using event-driven architectures. Refer below examples from Estonia's vision documents on proactive services and event-driven architecture:
{% file src="../.gitbook/assets/KrattVisionPaper.pdf" %}
{% file src="../.gitbook/assets/Next Generation Digital Government Architecture (1).pdf" %} {% endtab %}
{% tab title="Responsabilities" %} Who does what:
- Head of Service Design - Lead the integration of the service catalog.
- Service Design and Delivery Focal point - Complement and update the service catalog with services from their organizations. They follow up and coordinate the actions within their organization to digitize services according to the approved digitization roadmap {% endtab %}
{% tab title="Deliverables" %}
- Service prioritization criteria
- Ranked priority services {% endtab %} {% endtabs %}