diff --git a/analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzer.py b/analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzer.py
index 3bd26f92a4..a1aeed0710 100644
--- a/analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzer.py
+++ b/analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzer.py
@@ -169,12 +169,31 @@ def perform_analysis(args, skip_handlers, rs_handler: ReviewStatusHandler,
 
     config_map = analyzer_types.build_config_handlers(args, analyzers)
 
+    # Don't enable analyzers that have no checkers enabled. Some analyzers,
+    # like clang-tidy error out if none of theirs are enabled, which makes
+    # sense if you use them as a standalone tool, but not if you run a bunch
+    # of analyzers at once.
     no_checker_analyzers = \
         [a for a in analyzers if not __has_enabled_checker(config_map[a])]
     for analyzer in no_checker_analyzers:
         LOG.info("No checkers enabled for %s", analyzer)
         analyzers.remove(analyzer)
 
+    # Don't emit warnings for analyzers we failed to enable if none of their
+    # checkers were enabled anyways.
+    # TODO: Its perfectly reasonable for an analyzer plugin to not be able to
+    # build their config handler if the analyzer isn't supported in the first
+    # place. For now, this seems to be okay, but may not be later.
+    errored_config_map = analyzer_types.build_config_handlers(
+        args, [x for (x, _) in errored])
+
+    no_checker_err_analyzers = \
+        [a for (a, _) in errored
+         if not __has_enabled_checker(errored_config_map[a])]
+
+    errored = [(an, msg) for an, msg in errored
+               if an not in no_checker_err_analyzers]
+
     actions = prepare_actions(actions, analyzers)
 
     available_checkers = set()