Conversation
➖ Are we earthbuild yet?No change in "earthly" occurrences 📈 Overall Progress
Keep up the great work migrating from Earthly to Earthbuild! 🚀 💡 Tips for finding more occurrencesRun locally to see detailed breakdown: ./.github/scripts/count-earthly.shNote that the goal is not to reach 0. |
Summary of ChangesHello @janishorsts, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on a significant refactoring of error handling within the codebase. It systematically replaces direct error equality checks and type assertions with the more robust and idiomatic Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enables the errorlint linter and applies the necessary fixes across the codebase. The changes are generally excellent, replacing direct error comparisons with errors.Is and type assertions with errors.As, which improves error handling robustness. I've found a couple of areas for improvement, specifically regarding a test case that appears to have been broken during refactoring and an opportunity to standardize on the standard library's errors package.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enables the errorlint linter and applies the necessary fixes across the codebase. The changes consistently replace direct error comparisons (==) with errors.Is for sentinel errors, and type assertions on errors with errors.As. This improves the robustness of error handling by correctly handling wrapped errors. The changes are well-executed and align with modern Go error handling best practices. Great work!
1 participant
Blocked by #298