Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Server-only install option #84

Open
risto-liftoff opened this issue Oct 16, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Server-only install option #84

risto-liftoff opened this issue Oct 16, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@risto-liftoff
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for merging the PRs I opened. I'm wondering if you'd be open to me creating a PR to add a server-only install option that doesn't make any modifications to the database. Because my company has the expectation that any server can be thrown away and automatically replaced, I made the changes in a fork and added a server-only install option.

@mtesauro
Copy link
Collaborator

@risto-liftoff Interesting use-case - godojo was really created to replace an existing bash-based installer that only did the initial setup so that was never really considered.

Do you have links to how you've done that in your fork? I'm curious how you implemented that case.

@risto-liftoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, it's the last 2 commits on this branch: https://github.com/risto-liftoff/godojo/tree/separate-setup-ubuntu.

I only implemented it for Ubuntu, but I can add my changes to RHEL and the template OS files. And instead of having the config option be Install.DB.DontModify, I'd probably change it to Install.ServerOnly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants