Summary��grace
ul shutdown mid-request.��## Background��We want to keep the credential-issuance API auditable and sa
e to change. Landing this issue tightens one speci
ic corner and gives reviewers a clear di
to reason about rather than a general "cleanup" commit. It should be scoped small enough to close in a single PR.��## Acceptance criteria��- [ ] The change matches the summary above.�- [ ] Tests cover the new behavior (happy path + one e
plicit
ailure mode).�- [ ] Lint, type-check, and tests all pass locally.�- [ ] PR description re
erences this issue with Closes #<this-issue>.��## Implementation hints��- Pick the right test layer: unit tests inside the a
ected module
or pure logic, integration tests under tests/
or cross-module behaviour.�- Cover the happy path and at least one e
plicit sad path.�- Where the project uses proptest/ ast-check/ c, pre
er a property test over many hand-written cases. Commit any
ailing seed back to the repo.�- Keep test names assertive (returns_zero_when_balance_is_zero), not interrogative.��## Repo-speci
ic notes��- Node.js/TypeScript service. Install with npm ci and run npm test / npm run lint be
ore pushing.�- Follow the e
isting NestJS module layout — controllers thin, services own business logic.�- Prisma is the ORM; add new tables via prisma migrate dev --name <slug> and commit the generated migration.�- Do not log credential payloads in plainte
t — use the e
isting RedactedLogger.��## Out o
scope��- Unrelated re
actors in adjacent
iles.�- Stylistic-only changes (
ormatting, renaming) that are not required by the
i
.�- Anything beyond the acceptance criteria above; sur
ace
ollow-ups as separate issues.��## How to claim and submit��
. Comment on this issue saying you'd like to take it on; wait
or a maintainer to assign you (avoids duplicated e
ort).�2. Open a PR that re
erences this issue (Closes #<this-issue>).�3. Make sure CI is green and request review
rom a CODEOWNERS maintainer.�4. PRs that close this issue and pass review may quali
y
or a reward — see the MAYBE REWARDED label and the FWC26 campaign page.��---��Category: test · Campaign: GrantFo
OSS · O
icial Campaign | FWC26 · Maybe Rewarded
Summary��grace
ul shutdown mid-request.��## Background��We want to keep the credential-issuance API auditable and sa
e to change. Landing this issue tightens one speci
ic corner and gives reviewers a clear di
to reason about rather than a general "cleanup" commit. It should be scoped small enough to close in a single PR.��## Acceptance criteria��- [ ] The change matches the summary above.�- [ ] Tests cover the new behavior (happy path + one e
plicit
ailure mode).�- [ ] Lint, type-check, and tests all pass locally.�- [ ] PR description re
erences this issue with
Closes #<this-issue>.��## Implementation hints��- Pick the right test layer: unit tests inside the aected module
or pure logic, integration tests under
tests/or cross-module behaviour.�- Cover the happy path and at least one e
plicit sad path.�- Where the project uses
proptest/ast-check/c, preer a property test over many hand-written cases. Commit any
ailing seed back to the repo.�- Keep test names assertive (
returns_zero_when_balance_is_zero), not interrogative.��## Repo-speciic notes��- Node.js/TypeScript service. Install with
npm ciand runnpm test/npm run lintbeore pushing.�- Follow the e
isting NestJS module layout — controllers thin, services own business logic.�- Prisma is the ORM; add new tables via
prisma migrate dev --name <slug>and commit the generated migration.�- Do not log credential payloads in plaintet — use the e
isting
RedactedLogger.��## Out oscope��- Unrelated re
actors in adjacent
iles.�- Stylistic-only changes (
ormatting, renaming) that are not required by the
i
.�- Anything beyond the acceptance criteria above; sur
ace
ollow-ups as separate issues.��## How to claim and submit��
. Comment on this issue saying you'd like to take it on; wait
or a maintainer to assign you (avoids duplicated e
ort).�2. Open a PR that re
erences this issue (
Closes #<this-issue>).�3. Make sure CI is green and request reviewrom a
CODEOWNERSmaintainer.�4. PRs that close this issue and pass review may qualiy
or a reward — see the
MAYBE REWARDEDlabel and the FWC26 campaign page.��---��Category:test· Campaign: GrantFoOSS · O
icial Campaign | FWC26 · Maybe Rewarded