update

Author: mhjensen

doc/pub/week36/html/._week36-bs022.html

@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations" class="anchor">More interpretations </h2>
 
 <p>In this case the standard OLS results in </p>
 $$
-\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\boldsymbol{u}_i\boldsymbol{u}_i^T\boldsymbol{y},
+\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y},
 $$
 
 <p>and</p>
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations" class="anchor">More interpretations </h2>
 infinity.
 </p>
 
-<p>We will come back to more interpreations after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
+<p>We will come back to more interpretions after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
 
 <p>For more discussions of Ridge and Lasso regression, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.09169" target="_self">Wessel van Wieringen's</a> article is highly recommended.
 Similarly, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08823" target="_self">Mehta et al's article</a> is also recommended.

doc/pub/week36/html/week36-reveal.html

@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations">More interpretations </h2>
 <p>In this case the standard OLS results in </p>
 <p>&nbsp;<br>
 $$
-\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\boldsymbol{u}_i\boldsymbol{u}_i^T\boldsymbol{y},
+\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y},
 $$
 <p>&nbsp;<br>
 
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations">More interpretations </h2>
 infinity.
 </p>
 
-<p>We will come back to more interpreations after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
+<p>We will come back to more interpretions after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
 
 <p>For more discussions of Ridge and Lasso regression, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.09169" target="_blank">Wessel van Wieringen's</a> article is highly recommended.
 Similarly, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08823" target="_blank">Mehta et al's article</a> is also recommended.

doc/pub/week36/html/week36-solarized.html

@@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations">More interpretations </h2>
 
 <p>In this case the standard OLS results in </p>
 $$
-\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\boldsymbol{u}_i\boldsymbol{u}_i^T\boldsymbol{y},
+\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y},
 $$
 
 <p>and</p>
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations">More interpretations </h2>
 infinity.
 </p>
 
-<p>We will come back to more interpreations after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
+<p>We will come back to more interpretions after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
 
 <p>For more discussions of Ridge and Lasso regression, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.09169" target="_blank">Wessel van Wieringen's</a> article is highly recommended.
 Similarly, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08823" target="_blank">Mehta et al's article</a> is also recommended.

doc/pub/week36/html/week36.html

@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations">More interpretations </h2>
 
 <p>In this case the standard OLS results in </p>
 $$
-\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\boldsymbol{u}_i\boldsymbol{u}_i^T\boldsymbol{y},
+\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\mathrm{OLS}} = \boldsymbol{X}^T\boldsymbol{y},
 $$
 
 <p>and</p>
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ <h2 id="more-interpretations">More interpretations </h2>
 infinity.
 </p>
 
-<p>We will come back to more interpreations after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
+<p>We will come back to more interpretions after we have gone through some of the statistical analysis part. </p>
 
 <p>For more discussions of Ridge and Lasso regression, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.09169" target="_blank">Wessel van Wieringen's</a> article is highly recommended.
 Similarly, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08823" target="_blank">Mehta et al's article</a> is also recommended.