You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: ch7/hip/README.md
+1-1
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ You should see the studied A stimulus, an empty gap where the B stimulus would b
57
57
58
58
You can now observe the amount of interference on AB after training on AC -- it will be some but probably not a catastrophic amount. To get a better sense overall, we need to run multiple samples.
59
59
60
-
* Do `Run` to run 10 runs through AB / AC training, and click on the `Train Run Plot` to see the results, with the `Tst*Mem` stats from the testing run. Then click on the `RunStats Plot`, which reports summary statistics on the `TstABMem` results.
60
+
* Do `Run` to run 10 runs through AB / AC training, and click on the `Train Run Plot` to see the results, with the `Tst*Mem` stats from the testing run. After the 10 runs finish, click on the `RunStats Plot`, which reports summary statistics on the `TstABMem` results.
61
61
62
62
> **Question 7.6:** Report the `TstABMem:Mean` (average) values for the AB items. In general the AC and Lure items should all be at 1 and 0 respectively. How well does this result compare to the human results shown in Figure 1?
0 commit comments