@Codekrodile We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
Example from src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.java lines 24-24:
// this.storage = new Storage(filePath);
Example from src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.java lines 54-54:
// new Lubot("data/lubot.txt").run();
Example from src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.java lines 61-61:
Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.java lines 48-52:
/**
* The entry point of Lubot
*
* @param args Command-line arguments
*/
Example from src/main/java/lubot/tasks/TaskList.java lines 83-87:
/**
* Find tasks from a keyword.
*
* @param keyword The keyword to search.
*/
Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Messages
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.
@Codekrodile We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
Example from
src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.javalines24-24:// this.storage = new Storage(filePath);Example from
src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.javalines54-54:// new Lubot("data/lubot.txt").run();Example from
src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.javalines61-61:// public void run() {Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from
src/main/java/lubot/Lubot.javalines48-52:Example from
src/main/java/lubot/tasks/TaskList.javalines83-87:Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Messages
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact
cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sgif you want to follow up on this post.