-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
Description
Summary
Among the inputs to the model, parameters can be broken up by which ones should be firm details of the population and hospital, or reliable local calculations, and which ones are unknowns that observations should fit
Firm
- Regional population
- Market share
- ICU and Ventilator usage, as a fraction of hospitalized cases
- Lengths of stay
Unknown
- % Infections requiring hospitalization
- Spread parameter (as initial beta, doubling time, whatever)
- latency from infection to hospital presentation (["model"] Check impact of latent period delay from infectious to hospitalized on model dynamics and forecasts #340 for implementation of this variable)
- Effect of social distancing measures (as contact reduction rate, or adjusted beta, whatever)
Given a week or two worth of actual hospital admissions, it should be possible to automatically estimate values for all of these parameters.
Additional details
One potential confounding factor would be if the standard for hospitalization changes over time, to reflect increasing healthcare system burden and narrowed focus on the most critical cases.
Of the unknowns, latency should be the most general across regions and populations, but may still vary with distribution of demographics, comorbidities, etc, so it seems worth treating it as local.
Suggested fix
Take as many days of hospital admission data as available as input, and automatically determine all possible parameters.