Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion on flying focal point #621

Open
Zhentao-Liu opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Discussion on flying focal point #621

Zhentao-Liu opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Zhentao-Liu
Copy link

Zhentao-Liu commented Dec 25, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I recently process a CBCT scan with flying focal point, i.e., different focal points for odd/even frames. Actual focal point usually deviates from the ideal one, and such deviation could be described by "geo.offdetector". Although "geo.offdetector" could be input as an array to describe per frame focal point, but it reports bugs when running FDK algorithm. In FDK func of single_pass_algorithms.py, TIGRE currently performs zeropadding and perweighting2 first if "geo.offdetector" exsist, as shown in code. However, these two functions only accept 2-d vector input right now.

Describe the solution you'd like
Simple reimplementation is needed to make zeropadding and perweighting2 function accept array input.

Additional context
BTW, I wanna ask the unit of "geo.offdetector". I think it should be millimeter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant