You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a HL7 receiver, I want to have the maximum amount of data that is transmitted by senders, so that the data I receive is accurate and complete.
Description/Use Case
The IN1 mappings implemented a new extension, hl7v2-date, which is designed to store native HL7v2 date values (the DT datatype). We should extend the use of this extension to existing mappings, which may currently be using hl7v2-date-time. This will simplify operations involving datetime values but not date values (such as timezone conversions).
We should also take this opportunity to clean up date handling to make it consistent if any inconsistencies are found.
Risks/Impacts/Considerations
If any FHIR senders are currently using the hl7v2-date-time extension, they should also be informed of the hl7v2-date extension. The FHIR -> HL7v2 mapping will handle either extension, so this is strictly for the case where we want to separate date values from datetime values.
Dev Notes
Acceptance Criteria
Existing HL7 to FHIR mappings are updated so DT values are represented with the hl7v2-date extension.
RS FHIR extension glossary is updated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
User Story
As a HL7 receiver, I want to have the maximum amount of data that is transmitted by senders, so that the data I receive is accurate and complete.
Description/Use Case
The IN1 mappings implemented a new extension,
hl7v2-date
, which is designed to store native HL7v2 date values (theDT
datatype). We should extend the use of this extension to existing mappings, which may currently be usinghl7v2-date-time
. This will simplify operations involving datetime values but not date values (such as timezone conversions).We should also take this opportunity to clean up date handling to make it consistent if any inconsistencies are found.
Risks/Impacts/Considerations
If any FHIR senders are currently using the
hl7v2-date-time
extension, they should also be informed of thehl7v2-date
extension. The FHIR -> HL7v2 mapping will handle either extension, so this is strictly for the case where we want to separate date values from datetime values.Dev Notes
Acceptance Criteria
DT
values are represented with thehl7v2-date
extension.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: