-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
auto_screen fails #56
Comments
Now it fails on the formatted step.
|
stale issue. closing |
@water-e @esatel This issue is back again. The auto screening is failing but the problem may have started elsewhere?
|
Looks like there was failure in the downloading of the raw data. The auto screening is where the failure took place. |
There should be checking of empty files for all/most providers. An empty raw file should be discovered and removed if it doesn't meet a minimum file size in write_ts (which is very small). I'm surprised reformat doesn't catch it as well. Are there specifics to this? |
No indication beyond the screening of ph and do files failing because there was no data. See the traceback above. i am pasting possible relevant info from that traceback below
|
It is a vague message and situation, and we will probably have to fix that if we want to make progress. Are there logging messages or prints? Is there an opportunity to print out a file name. We need to know what file we are talking about. I don't see that. Additionally, it would actually be an advantage if this would NOT get restarted. I fear the missing file will just succeed on the second pass. The fact that it results in a hard stop is something we could probably adjust with try/except stuff, but it takes care. The problem is that this cheating compounds over time -- if I gloss over something quirky I usually just don't get the file forever after. |
Generally speaking I feel like we should be protected against writing trivially small files. However I just made up the required number of lines -- maybe the median test requires a particular minimum number of values. Let me know if you need me to look for file info to add so we get a better message. I don't think we can fix the last time but we might avoid the next incident. |
I looked into the station on the dashboard and it looks like this station just started reporting ph. So might be a genuine case of a sensor coming online. |
Is this still an issue? I see that the station is mentioned on the traceback, so that was the part I was missing. However the screened file for 2025 seems to be in continuous/repo/screened. Did you take an action? As mentioned above, these things are hard to tackle without a reproducible case. For reformat and maybe other tasks I used something called /quarantine. If a process got stuck, I put the offending file there. Otherwise if it works the next time we run it the offiending file is wiped out and we don't figure out what went wrong. |
Description
auto_screen fails
Relevant failure stack trace
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: