Skip to content

Rethink what is included in the Benchcab class #297

@ccarouge

Description

@ccarouge

Initially, the Benchcab class was to be used to define the CLI. There are now quite a few additional functions and it starts to feel like it contains what we don't know what to do with. #291 is adding an extra function there.

I am also not keen on the functions that have arguments (self, config) because config is an attribute of self already. And when passed via argument, we pass the value of self._config. So it seems we are mixing 2 different designs/ideas.

@CABLE-LSM/admins what do you think?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions