Update protocol and contracts docs to match current state#14
Merged
Conversation
A1igator
force-pushed
the
A1igator/docs-update-protocol-contracts
branch
from
deac253 to
9c3881a
Compare
vraspar
reviewed
Mar 19, 2026
vraspar
reviewed
Mar 19, 2026
vraspar
reviewed
Mar 19, 2026
|
|
||
| <Steps> | ||
| <Step title="Authorize"> | ||
| Lock funds in escrow at request time. Client signs ERC-3009 authorization, facilitator calls `escrow.authorize()` to pull tokens into escrow contract. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
improve wording, um dashes
A1igator
force-pushed
the
A1igator/docs-update-protocol-contracts
branch
2 times, most recently
from
345b23b to
e729a1a
Compare
vraspar
reviewed
Mar 19, 2026
|
|
||
| **Use case:** Enable clients and operators to discover and verify arbiters on-chain. | ||
|
|
||
| ### ERC3009PaymentCollector |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we break down this file into multiple section/pages. Just suggestion
vraspar
requested changes
Mar 19, 2026
A1igator
force-pushed
the
A1igator/docs-update-protocol-contracts
branch
2 times, most recently
from
854a7f0 to
f59d467
Compare
- Rewrite escrow scheme spec to align with x402 PR #1425 and issue #1011 (settlement methods, nonce derivation, verification/settlement logic, error codes, PaymentInfo struct, expiry ordering) - Update all contract addresses to unified CREATE3 (same on every chain) - Add missing contracts: ArbiterRegistry, RefundRequestEvidence, ReceiverRefundCollector, SignatureCondition, SignatureRefundRequest - Add all 11 supported chains to index page - Fix PaymentInfo struct in architecture docs (was missing fields) - Fix payment flow diagrams to route through operator (not escrow directly) - Update factories with CREATE3 addresses and additional factory list - Update roadmap with escrow scheme spec submission status - Fix comparison hybrid example with correct escrow extra fields Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
A1igator
force-pushed
the
A1igator/docs-update-protocol-contracts
branch
from
f59d467 to
04097ba
Compare
vraspar
approved these changes
Mar 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
preApprovalExpiry,refundExpiry,salt, had wrong field ordering)Test plan
npx mint devand verify all pages render@x402r/coreconfig🤖 Generated with Claude Code