Authority receipts for parallel coding-agent orchestration

[rpelevin]

Hi maintainers/users - I am testing an authority-before-action receipt pattern for parallel coding-agent orchestration.

The narrow question is: before parallel agents move from planning into consequential execution, can the workflow prove what authority applies to package publication, production deployment, workflow closure, permission change, or other side effects?

I put a credential-free dry-run benchmark here:

https://github.com/neurarelay/relay-action-card

For this repo, the closest starting path is:

npm run benchmark:agent-authority -- --dry-run --json --source=github_discussion --campaign=agent_authority_week --surface=composio_agent_orchestrator_authority

This is not an Agent Orchestrator approval, endorsement, integration, partnership, listing, pass, or fail claim. It is a proposed authority-before-action boundary for parallel coding-agent execution.

Question for maintainers/users here: is a pre-action authority receipt useful before parallel coding agents execute consequential changes, or would the better insertion point be somewhere else in the orchestration lifecycle?