What happens
GEAK turns the user's test command into a COMMANDMENT with four modes: --correctness, --benchmark, --full-benchmark, and --profile.
But if the user's command has none of GEAK's mode flags - for example a plain:
timeout 600 python op_tests/test_rmsnorm2dFusedAddQuant.py
then GEAK puts the same unchanged command into all four modes. Every mode just re-runs the exact same thing. In a real run, the generated COMMANDMENT.md had four identical timeout 600 python ... bodies.
Why it happens
src/minisweagent/run/preprocess_v3/tools.py:111 - _substitute_mode_flag: when the command has no known flag, it returns the command unchanged (line 127). So nothing distinguishes the four modes.
_make_tool_commandment_from_user_command then emits that same command for every mode.
- The harness-synthesis path (
tools.py:184, _try_synthesize_shell_contract_harness) only triggers for compound cmd_a && cmd_b commands (if "&&" not in cmd: return None), so a single plain command never gets a proper per-mode harness.
Real-world impact
Two problems showed up in a kernel run because of this:
- Wrong operation benchmarked. The harness defaults to
--mode 1 (plain rmsnorm), but one kernel was add_rmsnorm, which needs --mode 2. Since no mode was ever chosen, that kernel was measured on the wrong op.
- Timeouts. With no shape/size arguments chosen per mode, every mode ran the harness's full default sweep and hit the 600s limit before optimization could begin.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: the four modes are genuinely different - correctness runs a small quick check, benchmark/full-benchmark use the right op and sizes, profile wraps the benchmark. If a mode truly cannot be built, say so clearly.
- Actual: all four modes are identical copies of the user's command, and a missing flag silently produces duplicates instead of a warning.
Suggested direction
Let the preprocessor's orchestrator LLM author the actual command for each of the four modes (choosing the right op / --mode, small shapes that finish under the timeout, and iteration counts that honor GEAK_BENCHMARK_ITERATIONS), instead of mechanically copying one command into all four. When a mode cannot be authored, emit a visible warning rather than a silent duplicate.
What happens
GEAK turns the user's test command into a COMMANDMENT with four modes:
--correctness,--benchmark,--full-benchmark, and--profile.But if the user's command has none of GEAK's mode flags - for example a plain:
then GEAK puts the same unchanged command into all four modes. Every mode just re-runs the exact same thing. In a real run, the generated COMMANDMENT.md had four identical
timeout 600 python ...bodies.Why it happens
src/minisweagent/run/preprocess_v3/tools.py:111-_substitute_mode_flag: when the command has no known flag, it returns the command unchanged (line 127). So nothing distinguishes the four modes._make_tool_commandment_from_user_commandthen emits that same command for every mode.tools.py:184,_try_synthesize_shell_contract_harness) only triggers for compoundcmd_a && cmd_bcommands (if "&&" not in cmd: return None), so a single plain command never gets a proper per-mode harness.Real-world impact
Two problems showed up in a kernel run because of this:
--mode 1(plainrmsnorm), but one kernel wasadd_rmsnorm, which needs--mode 2. Since no mode was ever chosen, that kernel was measured on the wrong op.Expected vs actual
Suggested direction
Let the preprocessor's orchestrator LLM author the actual command for each of the four modes (choosing the right op /
--mode, small shapes that finish under the timeout, and iteration counts that honorGEAK_BENCHMARK_ITERATIONS), instead of mechanically copying one command into all four. When a mode cannot be authored, emit a visible warning rather than a silent duplicate.